The correspondence shown in this section illustrates the World Health
Organization (WHO)'s fears regarding potential risks of Recombinant DNA.
In 1976 and 1977 the WHO, while acknowledging that plasmids were useful in
research related to infectious diseases (for example in the study of R-Factors,
the transfer of resistance to antibiotic drugs), stopped funding plasmid stock
centers throughout the world.1, 2
The WHO did not seem to realize that a loss of antibiotic effectiveness due
to increasing resistance, could cause infectious diseases to spread throughout
the world; further, that the extension of antibiotic resistance might also allow
infectious diseases to spread from plants and animals to humans.
Stock centers affected included:
1 "The program on mechanisms of resistance to Antimicrobial Agents in the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases had its inception in 1965 as a consequence for a report prepared for the Institute on drug resistance. ... Substantial clinical and epidemiological evidence indicates that resistance to antimicrobial agents is to a great extent plasmid mediated." For further information, see the excerpt from "Evolution of Support for Plasmid Research by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases" by Irving DeLappe , elsewhere in this section.
2 "Proceedings of the 46th Annual Business Meeting", Genetics, 88, 1978 Supplement, #4, Part 2: s125-s127. Especially page s125:
The Committee on Maintenance of Genetic Stocks has for the past two years been educating itself to
assume more responsibility in planning for the preservation of our national resources of genetically
defined germplasm. The Committee was established by the Society because of concern that valuable and
sometimes irreplaceable genetic stocks were being lost because the responsibility for assuring their
maintenance had not been assumed by any persons or institutions.
Until recently the committee has been able to serve only in a watch-dog capacity, alerting geneticists
of situations in which valuable collections of stocks were endangered by lack of adequate supervision
or support, as upon the retirement or death of a curator or the reduction of research grant support.